Things That Matter

Trump Wants To Release Detained Immigrants Into Sanctuary Cities And Democrats Are Demanding Answers On The Controversial Plan

credit: megu

With former Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, along with other DHS officials who helped initiate the separation of families seeking refuge in the US, gone, Democrats have zeroed in on another opponent to the immigrant rights movement: Stephen Miller. Edit here.

According to those on the left, the 33-year-old White House adviser is behind President Donald Trump’s hard-line immigration policy. Most recently, he came up with the idea of releasing undocumented immigrants into “sanctuary cities.” Miller, who is frustrated that several asylum-seeking migrants are passing the first legal barrier of proving “credible fear” of persecution if they returned to their home country, believes sending them to Democratic-governed jurisdictions that have affirmed they would limit their cooperation with federal immigration authorities could teach progressive cities and local politicians a lesson.

While the plan was never carried out, Trump has recently expressed new interest in it.

“Just out: The USA has the absolute legal right to have apprehended illegal immigrants transferred to Sanctuary Cities. We hereby demand that they be taken care of at the highest level, especially by the State of California, which is well known or its poor management & high taxes!” the president said on Twitter.

Trump, hoping to ignite fear in people who live in sanctuary cities, added that Democrats should change immigration laws “fast. If not, Sanctuary Cities must immediately ACT to take care of the Illegal Immigrants – and this includes Gang Members, Drug Dealers, Human Traffickers, and Criminals of all shapes, sizes and kinds. CHANGE THE LAWS NOW!”

Democrats, who have conducted several oversight and investigations of Trump-related issues now that they have the majority of the House, want to question Miller on immigration next.

“Steve Miller, who seems to be the boss of everybody on immigration, ought to come before Congress and explain some of these policies,” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, Democrat of New York, said on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday.

However, it is likely that Miller might claim executive privilege, which would help him avoid testifying before the panel. Should he do that, Nadler said that would be “a misuse of executive privilege … Because he seems to be making the decisions, not the Cabinet secretaries who come and go.”

The remark was aimed at Trump, who’s often threatened when someone questions his power, but there is truth to the claim. Miller, a former congressional aide whose title is now senior policy adviser, was behind several of the Trump administration’s controversial immigration policies: orchestrating the January 2017 executive order that barred travelers from seven countries and suspended refugee admissions, to proposing a zero-tolerance approach at the US-Mexico border to dissuade Central American asylum-seekers from lawfully seeking refuge in the US, to pressuring agencies to take more action against migrants at the border.

Rep. Kathleen Rice (D-NY), who is the chairwoman of the House Homeland Security subcommittee on border security, facilitation and operations, told US News & World Report that Miller needs to come before her panel to “make his case for these terrible policies to the American people instead of being this shadow puppeteer.”

“It’s clear that he’s the one pulling the strings. And if he’s going to continue advocating for these policies and personnel change, then he needs to come before the American people and explain himself. He has to be held accountable,” she said.

Read: The U.S. Government Is Tracking Migrant Girls’ Periods And The Reason Why Is Even More Disturbing

Recommend this story by clicking the share button below!

Political AnyClip – Motel 6 Was Giving Guests Lists To ICE, Now They Are Paying $20 Million To The Victims

Entertainment

Political AnyClip – Motel 6 Was Giving Guests Lists To ICE, Now They Are Paying $20 Million To The Victims

A year and a half ago, people were appalled to know that the guests staying at Motel 6 in Arizona had their information compromised. It wasn’t hackers looking to score credit card information, but immigration officials aiming to track down undocumented immigrants.

When people realized that employees of Motel 6 gave away private information about hotel guests to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), a boycott ensued. Furthermore — because that tactic is extremely illegal — immigration advocates sued on behalf of thousands of people.

A year later Motel 6 faced two class action lawsuits, one in Washington and another in Arizona. Both cases have closed in huge settlements.

Motel 6 settled their cases out of court and agreed to pay $20 million to all guests with “Latin-sounding names.”

Screen-Shot-2019-04-10-at-4.43.27-PM5cb788db03153

The guests in Arizona got a whopping $7 million settlement, while in Washington, Motel 6 guests there will get $12 million. Guests with Latino-sounding names faced undue stress from having to answer ICE agents knocking on their room doors unexpectedly. However, there is one problem facing attorneys and those in the class action lawsuits.

Attorneys don’t know how to find the guests impacted by the lawsuits.

Screen-Shot-2019-04-10-at-4.43.27-PM5cb788db03153

Some people stayed at Motel 6 under fake names, others perhaps are not in the country anymore, so lawyers have one year to find patrons of the motel or else all of that money goes to waste.

Each guest — roughly 80,000 people — have to either come forward to get their money or else they will just lose it. However, it’s only natural that people are afraid to come forward because of their immigration status.

“The concern here is that this could be a victory in name only,” Geoffrey Hoffman, director of the University of Houston Law Center Immigration Clinic told Bloomberg News. “It does create a situation here where the party is penalized, but how will it amount to restitution to compensate these victims if their clients have been deported, and any records of deportation are held by ICE?”

READ: Motel 6 Is Being Sued By Two States For Violating Privacy Acts By Giving Guests Lists To ICE

Cardi B Is Pro-Bernie Sanders But She’s Still Keeping Her Options Open For 2020

Fierce

Cardi B Is Pro-Bernie Sanders But She’s Still Keeping Her Options Open For 2020

credit: megu

Cardi B is getting political again.

Our favorite rapper-slash-pundit talked about her disdain for President Donald Trump and dished on which Democratic presidential contenders have caught her eye so far in a red-carpet interview with Variety on Friday.

Recalling how fiercely the “Please Me” rapper criticized Trump’s government shutdown earlier this year, the publication asked Cardi what she would text or DM the president should she have the opportunity.

“I hate him. I just hate him. I don’t even want to get political, you know what I’m saying,” she said, letting out a major sigh.

But the Bronx hitmaker isn’t against all white male candidates. In fact, two, Bernie Sanders (D-VT) and Tim Ryan (D-OH), are among her top choices at the moment.

Cardi, who supported Sanders in the 2016 primaries against Hillary Clinton, said while she still hasn’t made a decision on who she’d be supporting in the next election, she’s going to “always go with Bernie.” The reason: “This is the thing, right? Bernie don’t say things to be cool. Like, there’s pictures of him being an activist from a very, very, very long time [ago].”

But she’s not completely sold on the Vermont senator just yet. Another contender, Ryan, has also piqued the Dominican-Trinidadian star’s interest.

“I was watching the news, and I saw this guy named Tim Ryan. And his speech was very convincing to me,” Cardi said. “He really wants to give the United States free health care, so that’s a big plus. We need health care. So I don’t know. We’ll see.”

Earlier this month, Cardi posted an instastory where she shared her enthusiasm for the Ohio politician’s speech on free healthcare for all, though she stated she still did not trust him.

In response, the representative, a cosponsor on Rep. Pramila Jayapal’s (D-WA) Medicare for All legislation, tweeted to the rapper, saying, “Every American deserves quality health care, period. Hope to earn your trust, @iamcardib.”

If free universal healthcare is on the top of Cardi’s list of issues that she’s taking into account when making the decision of who she’ll be voting for, she has a lot of candidates to sift through.  Most of the Democratic candidates in the crowded 2020 field have endorsed Medicare for All, including Sanders, who was long one of its few proponents.

Good thing for Cardi is she, like all of us, still has time to research more on all of the candidates before making her decision.

Read: Trump Wants To Release Detained Immigrants Into Sanctuary Cities And Democrats Are Demanding Answers On The Controversial Plan

Recommend this story by clicking the share button below!

Paid Promoted Stories

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *